The proposed amendments to Papua New Guinea’s Land Act are a cause for concern, argues the Institute of National Affairs’s Paul Barker. He says, if implemented, the legislation would scare off foreign investors at a time when the Government is looking for capital to encourage economic diversification.
The Institute of National Affairs’ Paul Barker
The proposed Land Act amendments are a considerable worry, especially when combined with the proposed, and very restrictive new reserved list under the new SME policy, some restrictions being pushed in agriculture, and the mammoth new Mining Act—all coinciding with low commodity prices and wider economic and governance issues in PNG.
As one long-standing overseas investor in PNG observed to me: ‘Everyone is wanting Foreign Direct Investment except North Korea, and I’m not sure that’s a good club for PNG to be joining!’
Much of PNG’s formal sector economic activity, employment and revenue is provided by foreign-owned or co-owned firms. They need some certainty and security, as well as positive prospective returns, to be able to stay and further invest.
In difficult times especially, it is the long-established firms here that continue to invest when newcomers shy away.
Economic growth and employment will be badly forestalled if overseas investors are driven out, by loss of access to IPA registration or State leases (both new and existing). Local businesses will not suddenly thrive on the back of the foreclosure of overseas-owned businesses.
Dissatisfaction
That said, it is understandable that there is wide public dissatisfaction with many overseas businesses that operate in an unregulated sector. Often they do not pay minimum wages, taxes or duties. Some are even operating in the already-restricted cottage industries. These latter businesses do provide a service, but they also squeeze out local business opportunities.
‘Corruption in land administration has been highlighted as one of the major impediments to buiness and investment.’
But, in these cases, it is more a case of applying existing laws, rather than introducing new rules.
Land Act
Specifically on the Land Act amendments, this was being pushed through hurriedly. The State Solicitor urged wider prior consultation with affected stakeholders before he issued a Certificate of Necessity.
There are certainly issues that need to be addressed with land laws and administration: not least revoking the large list of Special Agricultural and Business Leases (SABLs) grabbed illegally from customary landowners—notably without their consent—over the past decade. Also, the lack of a reliable and accessible land registry is a major issue.
But the Land Act amendment must be considered far more comprehensively and in coordination with related land legislation, including the Land Group Incorporation Act and the clauses over Forest Clearance Authorities (FCAs) under the Forest Act.
‘Removing the right of foreign businesses and individuals to hold State lease title may release some land on the market, but it will further undermine investment.’
Illegal SABLs cannot simply be legitimised retroactively by redesignating them under another piece of legislation. Corruption in land administration has been highlighted as one of the major impediments to business and investment in the Institute of National Affairs and Asian Development Bank’s periodic survey on PNG’s business environment.
Undermining investment
Removing the right of foreign businesses and individuals to hold State lease title may release some land on the market, but it will further undermine investment, including the capacity of businesses to hold or develop other capital assets, or secure project finance.
‘Hitting the already beleaguered private sector now with a deluge of further restrictions, whether or not they’re applied, is not the way to go for PNG.’
The government could consider restrictions on some types of land or property investment, such as in old, rather than new, real estate—as in Australia (in theory, at least). This should be carefully considered, with thoughtful proposals raised with Government.
But hitting the already beleaguered private sector now with a deluge of further restrictions, whether or not they’re applied, is not the way to go for PNG and its population of young people who are seeking jobs and economic opportunities.
This is especially the case when the Government is also saying, in various policy documents, that it is seeking economic diversification in order to move away from an over dependence on the volatile, and temporary, resources sector.
Paul Barker is the Executive Director of the industry-funded think tank, the Institute of National Affairs.
USD 0.2475
AUD 0.3829
GBP 0.1953
EUR 0.2348
NZD 0.4224
JPY 38.74
SGD 0.3326
What has happened from the SABL COI Recommendations? We can not move forward without addressing issues highlightened in that enquiry? Too much has been lost to present and former crooked politicians and their cohorts who have enriched themselves with big bank accounts and luxurious lavish lifestyles. THIS NEEDS TO STOP FIRST. My suggestions is to put on hold the ammendments, deal with the current situation, address them with appropriate mitigating measures and if necessary, proceed with introducing reforms that will not only mitigate the mistakes of the past, but to also secure future development plans in a more transparent manner where all stakeholders involved are winners at the end. Enought talk about Investors and FDI and so on. What about the simple village at home? Land is their only asset they have. And if you take that away from them, what then do they cling on for survival in today challenging times and their future generation who are innocent from the decisions of today?
What is stated is very true and the proposed Act needs to be reviewed. Investment will suffer along with jobs at a time when the economy is extremely poor, especially outside Port Moresby. The existing land act needs to be made to work and lands need to apply existing laws to improve the current situation of land grabbing much of which is being supported through corruption.
What Sir Peter and Paul Barker say is so very true.
Despite the resource boom, PNG is still largely an agriculture based economy, and to hear that agriculture based exports have halved over the past 5 years is alarming to say the least, and should be ringing alarm bells. Mining and oil resource exploitation leaves a hole in the ground and little else, with the returns going mostly out of the country with big international corporations. Only relatively few landowners directly benefit from this. Agriculture and commercial agricultural exports bring most benefit to country-wide grass roots communities.
Mining and other resources should be the butter, with agriculture the bread. Long after resources are exhausted, agriculture will remain, but only at truly sustainable and expanding levels if supported and expanded by Government focus and inputs. To have export levels dropping by 50% is utterly inexcusable. Someone needs to wake up.
Totally agreed with Sir Peter, Paul Baker and John Wilkinson’s comments. Its just common sense. Greater emphasis should be placed on where the majority of the population lives- the rural area. Windfalls from mining should be redirected through budget appropriations to develop rural infrastructure so locals can help themselves grow cash crops and trade for a living. Incentives should be given to investors who want to manufacture in country as this activity alone will directly create jobs as well as support village farmers produce and supply the market. It does not take a rocket scientist to see this. Please do the right thing for our people in the rural areas.