Papua New Guinea’s new Prime Minister said shortly after his election that PNG could become the ‘richest black nation on Earth’ within 10 years. Can it be done? Economist Maholopa Laveil considers.
PNG’s Prime Minister James Marape. Credit: LOOP
James Marape was elected PNG’s eighth Prime Minister on 30 May 2019. That same evening, he addressed the country on one of its free-to-air television stations, EMTV, and later on social media, announcing that he aspired to make PNG the ‘richest black Christian nation on planet Earth’ within 10 years.
To assess the realism of such an aspiration, I put together a list of the top ten richest, black, Christian nations.
Christian nations are identified as those where most of the population identify as Christian (of whatever denomination). The richest were those with the highest real GDP in 2011 US dollars (‘real’ means adjusted for inflation) per person, using purchasing power parity (PPP) which adjusts for different costs of living across countries. Real GDP per capita is a good indicator of wealth, as it measures the amount of income available to each person in a country. Black countries are those from sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific.
The richest black nation is Bermuda, with a GDP per capita of US$50,669 (K170,404). Bermuda is also predominantly Christian. Four nations that make the top-ten list are African, the remaining six are Caribbean nations. None of the predominantly black Christian nations in the Pacific region were wealthy enough to make the list (the richest being Fiji with a real GDP per capita of US$8,703 [K29,269]).
It is of interest that none of the countries that make the top 10 are as populous as Papua New Guinea. However, there are also larger black nations with a much higher GDP per capita than PNG (for example, South Africa, with more than three times PNG’s GDP per capita.
‘While it is good to aspire to higher income, aiming to become a high-income country within a decade is unrealistic.’
All top-ten nations have a GDP per capita of above US$13,000 (K44,023), making them relatively wealthy, compared to PNG’s GDP per capita of US$3,825 (K12,864).
If a simple compound growth rate is applied, for PNG to reach Bermuda’s current GDP per capita within ten years, it would have to sustain growth at 30 per cent yearly.
Credit: Devpolicy
Papua New Guinea’s growth
PNG has never experienced 30 per cent growth in the past; nor has any other country for that matter, at least not for any sustained period.
PNG has experienced two notable high GDP per capita growth rates in the past (according to World Bank data). In 1993, PNG enjoyed 15.3 per cent growth. However, its growth rate plummeted to negative 5.8 per cent growth in 1995 during a period of excessive government spending, increased domestic interest payments, and unbudgeted advances on government price support scheme, decreasing public confidence and leading to capital flight and depletion of the Central Bank’s foreign reserves.
‘It may be more realistic to settle for goals such as catching up with Fiji’s per capita GDP.’
PNG’s second-highest real GDP per capita growth period was in 2014, when the country experienced a 13 per cent growth rate resulting from the first shipments of the PNG LNG project. This was also followed by a sharp decrease in 2016 to negative 0.5 per cent growth. This sharp decrease was due to the fall in world oil prices in 2015, which affected government budget revenues and resulted in a reduction in real GDP growth in subsequent years.
Policies
Policy changes proposed by the new government centre on increased local content in renegotiated mining and petroleum agreements, coupled with improved mechanisms for corruption detection and prosecution, and better accountability of government ministers.
Regardless of the merits of these policies, PNG’s history has shown it has not been able to sustain high growth rates. There are no quick and easy solutions to issues around lack of infrastructure, remoteness, and volatility in resource prices that make economic growth in PNG difficult.
While it is good to aspire to higher income, aiming to become a high-income country within a decade is unrealistic.
It may be more realistic to settle for goals such as catching up with Fiji’s per capita GDP of US$8,703, and aiming to be the richest Pacific nation, outside Australia and New Zealand. Even this would require a growth rate of 8.6 per cent for the next ten years (assuming Fiji doesn’t grow at all).
Catching up with Fiji alone will require not only very good policies, it will require longer than a decade.
This is an edited version of a story first published in Devpolicy Blog. Maholopa Laveil is Lecturer in Economics at the School of Business and Public Policy at the University of Papua New Guinea.
USD 0.2475
AUD 0.3829
GBP 0.1953
EUR 0.2348
NZD 0.4224
JPY 38.74
SGD 0.3326
Actually, the poster had understood Prime Minister’s statement from GDP per capita perspective which he is correct also according to his understanding. And you those commentators are also correct according to how you understand PM’s statement. But generally, Prime Minister’s statement of turning PNG into a richest black nation in 10 years time is a “flip-flopping” statement I would rather say. When someone is drunk or under extreme emotion, he/she makes statements that does not have concrete meaning or rather statements out of context in reality. After becoming PM from no way, PM made this emotional speech that does not have meaning.
When you look at someone saying he will turn a country into a black richest country on planet earth in 10 years time, mate the word “Christian” and “Rich” are two distinct words. PNG is already not a christian nation, though our constitution says we are christian nation. We already have an Islam population living in PNG. They have their mosques in Hohola, Port Moresby and other centers in PNG. So does Marape has any plan to remove these mosques or forcefully ban other religions into PNG?
And the other word “Rich” is too broad. What is it that we will be going to be rich in? Are we going to be rich in GDP per capita as alluded by poster? Or are we going to be rich in christian values? Or are we going to be a developed state in 10 years time? What does he actually mean when he said “rich”? He was not specific on what area that we will actually be rich in. For that reason, I would say that PM’s statement was an emotional statement that does not have any meaning at all. It’s a statement without any form of meaning at all.
I am sorry to say that. We are human being and we are prone to make mistakes. PM made a mistake in uttering this “flip-flopping” statement in his inauguration.
Like the saying goes, “An economists guess is as good as anyone’s.” Using only GDP as a yardstick is not correct in terms of PNG as explained articulately above! We have to use GNP, GDP, CPI increases, population and inflation to properly measure our national wealth. Just using GDP is like trying to use a person’s bank a/c balance to determine his/ her net worth. It’s just an unbalanced and narrow method of trying to determine our wealth!
Firstly, the Prime Minister James Marape’s aspirations for PNG to be the “richest black christian nation” in ten years is unrealistic and is not achievable because the socio-economic conditions are not there in PNG for such to happen. I thought he would have talked about achieving our Vision 2050 goals – one of which is to be in the top 50 nations by HDI. In 2018, PNG was ranked 153 out of 188 countries with a HDI of 0.516 and was in the Low Human Development category of nations.
The country ranked 50th in 2018 was Monte Negro with a HDI value of 0.814 and Russia with a HDI value of 0.816 was ranked 49th by HDI and were in the Very High Human Development category of nations. Fiji was ranked 92 with a HDI value of 0.741 and placed in the High Human Development category of nations.
There is about 31 more years to go before 2050 so our prime minister should have aspirations for achieving Vision 2050 rather than the not so achievable “richest black christian nation” in ten years.
Secondly, if the prime minister wants PNG to be the “richest black christian nation” in ten years, or something close to that, the following three things must happen in the country.
1) Eliminate all forms of corruption in PNG.
2) Put in place high quality world class economic infrastructure like roads, wharves, airports and others. The missing-link roads should be given high level priority to open up the rest of the country for economic development.
3) Halt or reduce further human population growth in the country by encouraging less than 4 children per family in PNG immediately.This should be done not as a law but through general government encouragement through saturated family planning awareness.
If we can do the above as a nation, I believe we achieve the goals of Vision 2050.
Agree on this article and let me also add that GDP is not a good yard stick to measure a nation’s wealth given the bulk of PNG population is not on workforce, wealth has got to be measure interns of, housing standards, clean water, health, education, living standards and others. Also the word ‘Black’ in this sounds a bit wrong, the terminology sounds inappropriate as we are a nation of different races now, also ‘planet earth’ sounds very odd. There are developing nations as some mention in this article that we can ascribe to be at par after some 50 years.
The logic is right however the short and long term goals that PNG want to achieve has got to be realistic than it attainable.