Opinion: Boosting the domestic economy is the key to increasing Papua New Guinea growth

Welcome,

The creation of the PNG LNG project highlights the next major challenge facing Papua New Guinea: how to grow the non-mining sectors. Economist Dan Gay says growing domestic demand, the internet and service industries can help overcome inherent problems.

The Pacific Policy Institute's Dan Gay

The Pacific Policy Institute’s Dan Gay

Whatever the Pacific’s been doing until now, it hasn’t been working.

Overall economic growth in Papua New Guinea, leaving aside the LNG project, has been lacklustre. And the same applies in other Pacific states.

World Bank data shows that in 1980, just after most countries became independent, merchandise trade in Pacific Island small states was 88.8% of GDP.

Twenty-two years later, in 2012, it had actually fallen to 76.5%. In the rest of the world, it rose from 35.2% to 50% of GDP over the same period.

Main challenges

The main challenges are transport costs, including shipping both internationally and domestically, as well as energy, finance, infrastructure and costs resulting from a lack of domestic competition.

Low formal employment is a challenge, as are the tyranny of distance, a lack of economies of scale, geographic fragmentation and isolation.

Story continues after advertisment...

Policymakers had imagined that trade agreements would somehow automatically solve all the Pacific’s trade problems.

Currently Pacific exports comprise about the same proportion of GDP as in 1989, roughly the start of the liberalisation period, manifested in the signing of trade agreements.

Clearly trade agreements haven’t much boosted either trade or exports.

To boost productive capacity you need an activist government (and donor community) capable of stimulating capital accumulation, technological progress and structural change through policy. This is what happened in almost all other successful developing economies, with and South Korea and Japan being the prime examples.

The Pacific is borrowing an inappropriate trade model from elsewhere, and needs to use a much more development-focused model, which is tailored to its own ends.

Boosting production

I don’t think there’s much scope for intra-regional goods trade. The Pacific island countries aren’t going to sell much fish or coconuts to each other.

To boost productive capacity you need an activist government (and donor community) capable of stimulating capital accumulation, technological progress and structural change through policy.

This is what happened in almost all other successful developing economies, with and South Korea and Japan being the prime examples.

They were able to export their way to success partly because they built such a big domestic engine, not just via the increasing penetration of international markets. The issue of boosting domestic demand has been neglected in the Pacific, with too much faith placed in demand from overseas.

In my view, the Internet represents a huge and until now under-exploited opportunity for services trade in the region. It doesn’t matter where you are in the world. It addresses many the problems of the islands, like distance, smallness and fragmentation.

Service industries

The one bright spot for trade in the Pacific is in services.

Principally this means tourism but other areas are emerging too, like the export of labour.

My calculations, using World Bank data, show that average trade in services from the Pacific island states has risen from 39.2% of GDP in 2005 to 50.0% in 2012.

Business process outsourcing and call centres, even things like engineering, education and architectural services can all be potentially traded online.

The Melanesian Spearhead Group trade in services agreement is an example. There is provision for nurses and others to bypass the normal immigration and work permit rules.

In my view, the Internet represents a huge and until now under-exploited opportunity for services trade in the region. It doesn’t matter where you are in the world. It addresses many the problems of the islands, like distance, smallness and fragmentation.

And certain countries in the region have good education and skills, the kind of things that could be sold online.

Business process outsourcing and call centres, even things like engineering, education and architectural services can all be potentially traded online.

The Pacific needs to develop a trade and economic development model that suits its own circumstances.

Dr Dan Gay is an independent political economist and a member of the board of advisers of the Pacific Institute of Public Policy, based in Vanuatu.

Comments

  1. Powering the Domestic Economy
    For PNG to be vibrant in Trade at both MSG level, Asia Pacific and even covering Europe, the domestic economic strength is the key. If we talk big in trade and don’t build and furnish up the domestic economy, we can’t be that strong and competent. Before we engage in any trade relation, we have to build up the domestic economy first.

    The domestic economy can be defined as the total measure of production and consumption of goods and services within the country. For instance, number and volume of goods and services produced and consumed within the country. The domestic economic strength is determined by the number and volume of commodity trade and financial transactions happening per day, and at a progressive phase. To increase this capacity, necessary infrastructure including; transport, communication, banking services etc needs to be provided, standardized, up-scaled and maintained at all cost. Adding to this, empower the local population with appropriate skills, incentives and the rightful opportunity. Restrict foreign investors from investing into areas where businesses right fully belongs to the nationals. Give due consideration to manufacturing sector, and where appropriate provide financial support to boost this sector will improve and help the exporting sector.

    What Economist Dan Gay said is absolutely true. “The main challenges are transport costs, including shipping both internationally and domestically, as well as energy, finance, infrastructure and costs resulting from a lack of domestic competition”. The competition level is very low, and price escalations is directly due to supply constraint. Lack of competition result in poor service at high cost. The high cost of doing business within the economy undermines the potential of domestic investors, result in low growth.

    Daniel Kereka – Central China Normal University (China)

Leave a Reply